Uber Technologiesreason 04 of 4it owns a thing that cannot be built or permitted twicederived 2026-09-11accession 0001543151-26-000032
If, as a result of legislation or judicial decisions, we are required to classify Drivers as employees, workers or quasi-employees where those statuses exist, we would incur significant additional expenses for compensating Drivers
To comply with Proposition 22, we have incurred and expect to incur additional expenses, including expenses associated with a guaranteed minimum earnings floor for Drivers, insurance for injury protection and subsidies for health care. We do not expect these changes will have a material impact on our business, results of operations, financial position, or cash flows
In November 2020, California voters approved Proposition 22... we expect that Drivers will be able to maintain their status as independent contractors under California law
The California Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Proposition 22
no findingread · nothing bore on it
It held on this filing. No finding was written because nothing in it bore on the reason — the sentences it was read against are below.
the evidence · every sentence checkedfive sentences · whole, uncut
the claims it rests on
“If, as a result of legislation or judicial decisions, we are required to classify Drivers as employees, workers or quasi-employees where those statuses exist, we would incur significant additional expenses for compensating Drivers”
“To comply with Proposition 22, we have incurred and expect to incur additional expenses, including expenses associated with a guaranteed minimum earnings floor for Drivers, insurance for injury protection and subsidies for health care. We do not expect these changes will have a material impact on our business, results of operations, financial position, or cash flows”
“In November 2020, California voters approved Proposition 22... we expect that Drivers will be able to maintain their status as independent contractors under California law”
“The California Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Proposition 22”
what it was checked against
materiality assessment of changes
“We do not expect these changes will have a material impact on our business, results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.”